Back in April, I “predicted” we’d see 150 to 200 thousand deaths from COVID-19 in the US. As we are now in that range, I’m hoping I was right and we don’t go past the 200,000, but of course this is so far outside my expertise that my guess means little. But here we are and school openings approach. Some seem deadly afraid of school openings and some seem deadly afraid of schools not opening. (I’m primarily thinking here about K-12, but much of what I say applies to colleges as well—and of course, high school juniors and seniors are more like college freshman than kindergarteners in terms of COVID-19 transmission and symptoms.)
Those conflicting views often accompany two others: that people favoring school openings foolishly think young children are immune to the effects of COVID-19 (or otherwise don’t understand the risks of reopening) and that people opposing school openings don’t care about education (or otherwise overestimate the risks of reopening).
Meanwhile, I don’t believe any thinking person really thinks any children are immune to COVID-19, despite claims coming from the White House. Of course, young children do seem to get badly sick from the virus much less than anyone expected back in March. And there is no reason to believe that those worried about sending kids into closed buildings with hundreds of others don’t care about education.
My biggest issue with discussions about this—and many things—is that people seem unable or unwilling to keep the pros and cons in mind at the same time. But schools are, by and large, run by groups of people that have to be able to do just that in order to make rational decisions about whether to open, close, reopen, re-close schools—sometimes despite political pressures by governing bodies, unions, parental organizations, and more.
This has to be a hugely difficult question and cannot be made without considering both the costs and the benefits. At a minimum that includes the following assumptions (yes, I think both of these are true):
-if schools are open, kids and teachers are going to get sick (plexiglass around the kids, masks all day, etc, is not going to stop it). They will also bring the disease to their families, friends, and neighbors. We’re likely to pass 200k deaths more quickly (and with more children) than we would if schools stay closed.
-if schools are closed, children of working class parents will suffer long term consequences. Their parents can’t stay home with them and help them with their schoolwork. Middle class and wealthier parents will hire tutors or join “educational pods” where parents pool resources to monitor children doing school work, but not those from poorer backgrounds. (And as others have noted, there will be more cases of suicide and spousal and child abuse.)
There are further economic issues that would follow either decision as well, but I’ll not delve into those here. What I want to urge now is simply (a) not demonizing those you disagree with about this and (b) bearing in mind both the pros and cons if you have decision making capacity here.
I keep myself limited to those two points as I really don’t know what the best route is for any school (and, of course, different schools in different locales with different population densities and with different student bodies, will be different). I suspect a lot of thought will be going into it, and not just from current school administrators and school boards. (And parents—the topic of a future post.)
Hopefully, new ideas will emerge that actually bring new approaches and new institutions that do better for children than schools now do. Smaller schools with more parental decision making, more variety of teaching techniques, and yes, better use of technology to not merely monitor children and allow for physically distanced communication, but also to spark curiosity. I can’t predict the innovations; I remain optimistic that they will come and that innovators will consider the many concerns as they seek to appeal to a wide customer base.
This pandemic is going to have long term effects. We are likely to see more work at home across the board and less use of commercial office space and that may bring new opportunities for housing, lower rents in some areas, and reductions of city populations. Better systems of education responding to these changes and the above challenges would be a wonderful outcome of a bad situation.
(Thanks to Ronit Elk for the impetus to write this and to JP Messina for helpful suggestions and comments.)